Featured Posts

GRR Spotlight: Suhui Li on Cracking the Admissions Code

by Karen Kegel

Suhui Li outside of her academic home, the Rauch Business Center

Exactly how university admissions procedures operate is a mystery to many—including for the thousands of high school seniors who apply to their dream schools each year. One aim that drives the process is constraining matriculation to the most desirable candidates, for this is the stuff from which ratings are made. The decision to admit or reject must also take into account target numbers for the incoming class as well as top students’ likelihood of selecting competing offers.

Third-year Lehigh graduate student Suhui Li, along with Dr. James Dearden and Dr. Chad Meyerhoefer of the Economics department, recently developed a model that quantifies how a possible signal of candidate preferences plays into admissions decisions. The group discovered that students’ contact behaviors—from calling a school across the country to visiting a campus in person—is highly useful for maximizing a particular college’s matriculation outcomes.

According to Suhui, two main methodological procedures got their model, which is based in game theory, off the ground. The game-theoretic parameters were set first. Underpinning the model are the assumptions that colleges have prior beliefs about the probability of an applicant’s preferences, and that applicants’ perceptions inform their estimates of a school’s preferences.

Step two entailed collecting empirical evidence in support of the model based on admissions data from two different universities. As was expected, findings revealed that higher-quality candidates were more likely to contact the schools than lower-quality candidates. In addition, higher-quality candidates who contacted a school increased their probability of admittance. Finally, data suggested that admitting students who were previously in contact with a school increases matriculation rates. In short, taking contacts—otherwise known as “demonstrated interest”—into the admissions equation is greatly beneficial for both parties involved.

Presenting Research on Health and Economics

An international student who received her undergraduate degree in China, Suhui describes the Economics program at Lehigh as “small and cozy”—just the right environment for her to grow her research skills. She also appreciates both the freedom she has to research on her own as well as the opportunities to collaborate with multiple faculty members.

Suhui notes she was very intrigued by this research topic because it has the potential to impact the lives of students and their families across the country. Now, the word is starting to get out—at least in academic circles. In February, Suhui shared initial model results as presenter and session chair at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Economic Association in Philadelphia. Besides putting the finishing touches on an article for publication, the research trio plans to extend their model using larger samples of applicants across a wider range of schools. Once those results are in, there is no doubt every college-bound student in America will take notice.

GRR Spotlight: Assessing Online Learning Tools and Student Satisfaction

By Sarah Stanlick

Violet Kulo

Violet Kulo

There have been undeniable technological strides in recent years, and such advances have pushed new tools into all aspects of our daily lives.  Education is no exception to the utilization and popularity of these innovations.  The quality of those implementations varies, and for Violet Kulo, the question of that quality was key to understanding how technology meets the needs of learners inside and outside of the classroom.

Presented at the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) eLearn conference in November 2008, As the World Spins, Technology Spins Faster: A Global Long-Distance Education Program investigates students’ satisfaction in their use of online methods to participate in distance learning.  As instruction has been adapted for distance education with little or no teacher intervention, there needs to be a better understanding of the benefits and disadvantages of online learning.  After pouring over the datasets from their surveys, Violet and her team found that there was a definite quality compromise with the online experience when compared to instructor-led courses.

Violet Kulo

Violet Kulo presented her researsh at the AACE eLearn Conference

Violet conducted her research along with Dr. Daphne Hobson, who is the director of the Office of International Programs at Lehigh.  She credits the success of the research on strong collaborative teamwork and communication.  Violet notes, “The team work was great; we collaborated on everything.”  Elaborating, she explained that the research process included independent data analysis by each researcher, with the team then coming together to compare analyses, verify conclusions, and then craft the paper to disseminate the results.  The product of that collaboration was not only a presentation for the AACE eLearn conference, but was also incorporated into the book Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009.  Out of over 100 articles submitted for the publication, only 40 were selected for inclusion.

This research resonates with the entire educational community, and is very much in line with the biggest obstacles instructors and instructional designers face today.  Furthermore, as Violet and Dr. Hobson found, there is no replacement for the instructor/teacher.  The online experience, while satisfactory in its implementation, was seen by students as an experience of lessened quality.  This has implications for distance education programs and instructional designers, who must understand those pitfalls to improve the online learning experience.  Such findings will not stop the growth of online learning, but it must inform how programs are designed to maximize the educational experience.

While the research for this particular topic has been tabled for now, Violet continues to work assessing and improving the implementation of technology in the classroom. This commitment to educational research and the lessons learned through her research has informed her dissertation process. Working to create an online module for science inquiry, Violet is exploring another important technology, geographic information systems for use in the classroom. Her work furthers a tradition of research-to-practice work done by Lehigh’s College of Education that will continue to affect the landscape of educational research and practice nationwide.

There have been undeniable technological strides in recent years, and such advances have pushed new tools into all aspects of our daily lives. Education is no exception to the utilization and popularity of these innovations. The quality of those implementations varies, and for Violet Kulo, the question of that quality was key to understanding how technology meets the needs of learners inside and outside of the classroom.